<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edvatza.com/about-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edvatza.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: edvatza</title>
		<link>http://www.edvatza.com/about-2/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>edvatza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 11:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsmynaturephotography.com/?page_id=5#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Rick,

I am in Bar Harbor as I write. Tomorrow morning we head back up to Cutler for the boat ride back to Machias Seal island and the Puffins, Razorbills and Murre. I will be taking a 50D with a 300mm f/2.8L IS and  30D with a 70-200 f/2.8L IS. Last year I used a 400 5.6 and the 70-200. The Puffins are literally on top you when you are in the blind. The Razorbills are close as well. The Murres are a little farher off but you can still get them at 400mm. I will have a 1.4x and 2x TC to use with the 300 if I need it. SO no, I don&#039;t think you need to rent a 500. As a matter of fact the 100-400 may just be the ideal lens for this. Enjoy. Hopefully I will have some more photos to post after tomorrow. Finally, check you visit dates for the puffins. They come on the islands to breed and then they are gone around August or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>I am in Bar Harbor as I write. Tomorrow morning we head back up to Cutler for the boat ride back to Machias Seal island and the Puffins, Razorbills and Murre. I will be taking a 50D with a 300mm f/2.8L IS and  30D with a 70-200 f/2.8L IS. Last year I used a 400 5.6 and the 70-200. The Puffins are literally on top you when you are in the blind. The Razorbills are close as well. The Murres are a little farher off but you can still get them at 400mm. I will have a 1.4x and 2x TC to use with the 300 if I need it. SO no, I don&#8217;t think you need to rent a 500. As a matter of fact the 100-400 may just be the ideal lens for this. Enjoy. Hopefully I will have some more photos to post after tomorrow. Finally, check you visit dates for the puffins. They come on the islands to breed and then they are gone around August or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Eyre</title>
		<link>http://www.edvatza.com/about-2/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Eyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 13:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsmynaturephotography.com/?page_id=5#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Hi Ed.
Loved you puffin images.  I am looking forward to a trip to miane some time this summer. I noticed you had some nice tight images of the puffins and I was wondering if you needed a big lens for those.  I have a 100-400 Canon but would be able to rent a 500 or 600 if it is necessary.
Do you think it is required to get good frame filling shots of the birds?

Thanks

Rick Eyre
Wisconsin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed.<br />
Loved you puffin images.  I am looking forward to a trip to miane some time this summer. I noticed you had some nice tight images of the puffins and I was wondering if you needed a big lens for those.  I have a 100-400 Canon but would be able to rent a 500 or 600 if it is necessary.<br />
Do you think it is required to get good frame filling shots of the birds?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Rick Eyre<br />
Wisconsin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.edvatza.com/about-2/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 22:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsmynaturephotography.com/?page_id=5#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Marvelous photos of wildlife, love the most recent of the tree swallows. What darlings they are, rusty pipe or no! Ed, I&#039;ll listen for your horn as you zoom up 295! Thanks for your comments re robins-chaos.blogspot.com. RRR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marvelous photos of wildlife, love the most recent of the tree swallows. What darlings they are, rusty pipe or no! Ed, I&#8217;ll listen for your horn as you zoom up 295! Thanks for your comments re robins-chaos.blogspot.com. RRR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April Lorier</title>
		<link>http://www.edvatza.com/about-2/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>April Lorier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 01:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsmynaturephotography.com/?page_id=5#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Your photos are such a refreshment after a long day of writing! I do have a personal question to ask you if you will answer by email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your photos are such a refreshment after a long day of writing! I do have a personal question to ask you if you will answer by email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edvatza</title>
		<link>http://www.edvatza.com/about-2/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>edvatza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsmynaturephotography.com/?page_id=5#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Hi QPB,

Glad you found my blog and found it to your liking. Please do check back frequently.

Actually, the template is so old that it may start to look new. I think it is called Classic and I believe it is the first template that WordPress offered. I picked it because it allowed me to post larger images and include 10 posts per page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi QPB,</p>
<p>Glad you found my blog and found it to your liking. Please do check back frequently.</p>
<p>Actually, the template is so old that it may start to look new. I think it is called Classic and I believe it is the first template that WordPress offered. I picked it because it allowed me to post larger images and include 10 posts per page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QPB</title>
		<link>http://www.edvatza.com/about-2/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>QPB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsmynaturephotography.com/?page_id=5#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I was in search of some other photoblogs when I stumbled upon yours.  Very glad I did--wonderful photography, keep up the great work!  Have you on my blogroll and will check it out frequently.

May I ask what template you are using?  Its unusual--did you do some modifications to the CSS yourself?

Thanks again for sharing.
qpb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in search of some other photoblogs when I stumbled upon yours.  Very glad I did&#8211;wonderful photography, keep up the great work!  Have you on my blogroll and will check it out frequently.</p>
<p>May I ask what template you are using?  Its unusual&#8211;did you do some modifications to the CSS yourself?</p>
<p>Thanks again for sharing.<br />
qpb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edvatza</title>
		<link>http://www.edvatza.com/about-2/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>edvatza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsmynaturephotography.com/?page_id=5#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind words, KC.

The 5D is a wonderful camera. I say that not owning one. The 5D has a full frame sensor meaning the image size on the sensor is equivalent to 35mm film. I use a 50D and a 30D. They are both 1.6x crop cameras. The sensor is smaller than 35mm film and has the effect of cropping in on the subject. I use the crop cameras because I do a lot of bird photography and the crop helps me get a tighter image. For example, if I put a 400mm lens on a 5D, my effective focal length is 400mm. If I put that same lens on a 50D, the effective focal length (35mm equivalent) is 640mm. And the 50D costs half as much as the 5D.

As far as macro lenses, they are really all good. Canon makes excellent macro lenses (the 60mm which will only work on a 1.6x crop camera and the 100mm and 180mm &quot;L&quot; lens which will work on any Canon camera. But I use Sigma lenses for Macro - either the 70mm or the 150mm. I use the 150 more than the 70 but either will do a great job for flowers. The 150 does give you more working distance but that is more of an issue with critters that move - butterflies, insects and such. Flowers aren&#039;t going anywhere so you can get as close as you wish and the 70 will work fine.

Hope that helps. And I am glad you found my site inspirational. Come back and visit often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words, KC.</p>
<p>The 5D is a wonderful camera. I say that not owning one. The 5D has a full frame sensor meaning the image size on the sensor is equivalent to 35mm film. I use a 50D and a 30D. They are both 1.6x crop cameras. The sensor is smaller than 35mm film and has the effect of cropping in on the subject. I use the crop cameras because I do a lot of bird photography and the crop helps me get a tighter image. For example, if I put a 400mm lens on a 5D, my effective focal length is 400mm. If I put that same lens on a 50D, the effective focal length (35mm equivalent) is 640mm. And the 50D costs half as much as the 5D.</p>
<p>As far as macro lenses, they are really all good. Canon makes excellent macro lenses (the 60mm which will only work on a 1.6x crop camera and the 100mm and 180mm &#8220;L&#8221; lens which will work on any Canon camera. But I use Sigma lenses for Macro &#8211; either the 70mm or the 150mm. I use the 150 more than the 70 but either will do a great job for flowers. The 150 does give you more working distance but that is more of an issue with critters that move &#8211; butterflies, insects and such. Flowers aren&#8217;t going anywhere so you can get as close as you wish and the 70 will work fine.</p>
<p>Hope that helps. And I am glad you found my site inspirational. Come back and visit often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kcjewel</title>
		<link>http://www.edvatza.com/about-2/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>kcjewel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsmynaturephotography.com/?page_id=5#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Hi, Found you on burstmode&#039;s blog and glad I did!  Your photos are inspiring... they make me want to get out there right now and crawl around on the ground and it&#039;s COLD.  Also nice is to see someone who is shooting with a Canon body.  I&#039;ve shot film with the AE-1 for many, many years and just last year bought my first digital camera to &quot;try it out&quot;.  I&#039;m liking it so am getting ready to upgrade.  Do you have a favorite?  I must say the Mark 5 is tempting, but soooo expensive!  Also, do you have a favorite macro lens for flower photography?  I look forward to visiting here often.  Happy shutterbugging!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Found you on burstmode&#8217;s blog and glad I did!  Your photos are inspiring&#8230; they make me want to get out there right now and crawl around on the ground and it&#8217;s COLD.  Also nice is to see someone who is shooting with a Canon body.  I&#8217;ve shot film with the AE-1 for many, many years and just last year bought my first digital camera to &#8220;try it out&#8221;.  I&#8217;m liking it so am getting ready to upgrade.  Do you have a favorite?  I must say the Mark 5 is tempting, but soooo expensive!  Also, do you have a favorite macro lens for flower photography?  I look forward to visiting here often.  Happy shutterbugging!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edvatza</title>
		<link>http://www.edvatza.com/about-2/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>edvatza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsmynaturephotography.com/?page_id=5#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for the kind words, Cindy. I want you to know they are much appreciated. I like to think that my work is pretty good. To see it described as spectacular makes me feel... well, spectacular! I would be very happy to have you add it your blogroll.

Unfortunately, I have selected a template for my blog that, while very good for showing photos, doesn&#039;t allow for any of those cool add-ons. I can&#039;t even add a blogroll. But I did bookmark your blog and will visit it often.

Re:lenses - The first thing I learned about bird photography is that the lens is never long enough! I have two lenses that I use - a Canon 400mm f/5.6L and a Canon 300mm f/2.8L IS that I use with a 2x teleconverter to give me the equivalent of 600mm at f/5.6. The 300 2.8 is a superb lens and one of just a few that I would trust with a 2x TC. There is very little, if any, image degradation. And I should hasten to add that I use either a 50D or 30D camera body with a 1.6x crop factor so I am shooting at an effective focal length of 960mm. And it often still isn&#039;t long enough especially for the small songbirds we have around here. The 500mm f/4 or 600 f/4 would be nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for the kind words, Cindy. I want you to know they are much appreciated. I like to think that my work is pretty good. To see it described as spectacular makes me feel&#8230; well, spectacular! I would be very happy to have you add it your blogroll.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I have selected a template for my blog that, while very good for showing photos, doesn&#8217;t allow for any of those cool add-ons. I can&#8217;t even add a blogroll. But I did bookmark your blog and will visit it often.</p>
<p>Re:lenses &#8211; The first thing I learned about bird photography is that the lens is never long enough! I have two lenses that I use &#8211; a Canon 400mm f/5.6L and a Canon 300mm f/2.8L IS that I use with a 2x teleconverter to give me the equivalent of 600mm at f/5.6. The 300 2.8 is a superb lens and one of just a few that I would trust with a 2x TC. There is very little, if any, image degradation. And I should hasten to add that I use either a 50D or 30D camera body with a 1.6x crop factor so I am shooting at an effective focal length of 960mm. And it often still isn&#8217;t long enough especially for the small songbirds we have around here. The 500mm f/4 or 600 f/4 would be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cindydyer</title>
		<link>http://www.edvatza.com/about-2/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>cindydyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsmynaturephotography.com/?page_id=5#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Hi again, Ed!

Just wanted to share two more postings of mine, in case you don&#039;t run across them. One is of a chicory (love your shot, by the way) here:

http://cindydyer.wordpress.com/2008/07/21/blue-chicory/

And the other is a quick series of shots of birds at a bird feeder at a little park near my home:

http://cindydyer.wordpress.com/2008/07/06/birds-of-a-feather/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi again, Ed!</p>
<p>Just wanted to share two more postings of mine, in case you don&#8217;t run across them. One is of a chicory (love your shot, by the way) here:</p>
<p><a href="http://cindydyer.wordpress.com/2008/07/21/blue-chicory/" rel="nofollow">http://cindydyer.wordpress.com/2008/07/21/blue-chicory/</a></p>
<p>And the other is a quick series of shots of birds at a bird feeder at a little park near my home:</p>
<p><a href="http://cindydyer.wordpress.com/2008/07/06/birds-of-a-feather/" rel="nofollow">http://cindydyer.wordpress.com/2008/07/06/birds-of-a-feather/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.edvatza.com/about-2/feed/ ) in 0.46919 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 2:19 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 3:19 pm UTC -->
